I know that’s a strange title for a post but you would realize very soon why (hopefully) :)
My last post got 7 comments – that’s kind of a record… instead of feeling elated I felt like a “bottom 10 percentile guy being told why he is the top 10 percentile guy and why he could be the next CEO of the company - all this when he puts in his papers”…
Poor me? What the heck! I was afraid of this kind of reaction and made an attempt to dissuade the same in my post but people are people… people are good at “selective reading”… I am not least pleased for being labeled “poor me” especially because I never meant it that way! (Munjay, I am not taking off on you… though you commented “poor me” explicitly, others were saying the same implicitly).
Ah, the only good part being I realized that more people read my blog than I thought!
Anyways, I have decided to change my tracks again and comment on the current affairs… T20 is the hottest thing around and this might sound like a “run of the mill” attempt but let me give it a try. Am sure you would like it… Here I go…
I see lot of similarity between Russians and Indians as far respecting our past is concerned…
The first thing Russians did when communism was brought down was to bring down Lenin’s statue… and throw Gorbachev into oblivion… and give the power in the hands of a drunkard (Yeltsin)… Stalin and Khrushchev I can understand but why Lenin? Wasn’t he the guy who booted the Czar away? Why Gorbachev? Wasn’t he the guy who actually made all this possible – starting with glasnost and perestroika… it was all so euphoric – giving the power in the hands of the great messiah of democracy (how does it matter if he cant even walk straight because of his vodka laced breakfast, lunch and dinner)…
What happened? Russia saw very high level of inflation, hunger, unemployment, corruption and what not… There was a shortage of food – not that communists were hiding this problem from the world earlier - because there were no people to till the land – it’s all mechanized out there but you need people to run the machines… communists had this mandatory stuff of students being sent to farms in their summer vacation and stuff like that… may be it was “cruel” but it worked – it kept people well fed… but well, it’s a ‘democracy’ now – let people decide what they want to do – even if it means they want to die of hunger!
From being a super power, Russia is part of BRIC – Brazil, Russia, India and China – the upcoming economic powers of the world – in essence, more or less a third world country… Long live democracy!!
I am no great supporter of communism (neither in a political nor in an economic sense - looking at our own left parties makes me feel that they walk backwards!) but hey, why is capitalism better? It has its own evils… I guess capitalism is “better” because communism is a spent force today and capitalism is still thriving…
Anyways, let me not digress from the key topic – the problem I see with Russians is that they do not know how to respect their past – at least the parts which are better ones. They bashed all and sundry including Lenin and Gorbachev. They could not figure out bad from good. They went for the package. They felt democracy was good even if it was a Yeltsin inside and coomunism was bad even if it was a Gorbachev inside. The results are there for everyone to see...
So, why do I think Indians are similar?
Look at the way we are treating the “big three” after the T20 world cup win and the T20 win against Australia last week. Suddenly, these 3 guys are pariahs… they are the reason for all the evils in the Indian cricket… Everyone including media is talking about the energy, running between the wickets, fielding etc in T20… And how that is because of the absence of the “big three”!
Come on guys, Sachin is your most consistent performer in one-dayers in the last 2 series (England & Australia)… Am not sure what would have been the results if Sachin and Ganguly were not batting at the top… Rahul is a different story – he does not want the pressures of being the captain, he does not want the pressure of batting (check his latest scores) and he does not want the pressure of fielding (check the catches dropped recently) – for me, he is a mental case and should rather be in an asylum than ‘sportingly’ ferrying water for the team…
Coming back to the main topic (I have this knack of getting digressed, don’t I?), what people don’t seem to have understood is that T20 is tailor made for Indians – Indians are weak genetically (I mean relatively weak – food habits, life style, lack of red meat, lack of exercise – all this for generations; and please, don’t start calling me a racist just because I called Indians “weak” – labeling others as racists seems to be another “in thing” these days!)... the maximum they can sustain their energy is for 20 overs… I have seen Gambhir twice and Sehwag once batting for more than 10 overs – excellent running between wickets et all – but at the end of 10 overs their tongues were hanging 3 feet down in the want of oxygen and water… there is no way Gambhir can do this in a 50-over match… and Sehwag we all know…
The boundaries are shorter which means the fielders don’t need to run around much… It also means Yuvraj can hit all those sixers (no offence meant… Yuvi is one of the best hitters around!)… All in all, the game is just suitable for us Indians – and we will remain a major power in this game for some time to come…
In all this, we have just forgotten what the “big three” have done for the Indian team over the years and suddenly they are unwanted ones, the villains… please! Leave them alone – well, at least the “big two”… you want to take on Rahul? Please be my guest! In fact, I strongly feel Sachin can do a good job in T20 and agree with Gilchrist’s statement that T20 can elongate careers, being a shorter version… Gilly for one would definitely like to believe that at the ripe age of 35 :)
And now for this week’s poll –
(oh my gosh! scroll down!!)
Want to know of the writer in me? Buy my book - "Of A 'n' B"
Monday, October 22, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whom do you refer as big three?
ReplyDeleteI totally agree that we are not good at respecting our past. Its evident if you see the conditions of our relics.
ReplyDeleteMay be our collective memory is very short.
Awesome post Uday, infact digressing from the main topic and coming back to it is an interesting writing style.
ReplyDeleteOn T20, I agree and thanks to hundreds of years of poverty and drought that made our genes T20fied. Not sure about dada as he would take five to 10 overs to make his feet start moving but definitely Sachin should play.
A nice post on a topic thats close to almost everyone's hearts and I'm surprised to see only 3 comments so far! Guess none of your readers are active on HJW sports BB - maybe that place would get you an amazing response!
ReplyDeleteAnyway reading your blog seems to make me digress too ... all I wanted to say was I agree with all your analysis but I feel your getting too harsh on Rahul also too soon ... I think he will also bounce back pretty strong pretty soon. I'm ready to wager another Rs 500 on that ;)
Impressive context building in starting with Russians and making the point of how we are not good at respecting our past! That's very true..
ReplyDeleteOn T2O inception, this is also triggered to make cricket popular in US community who are crazy about watching short period (2-3 hrs)sports like american football, tennis. Well, good for us...
we should not forget that these are 2 different formats of the game and people performing in 1 might not be well suited for the other. Unfortunately that's how our team is:)
ReplyDeleteThe youngsters have been performing exceptionally well in this new format and i dont see any point in respecting past at the cost present and future. Anyways your Big three initially refused to play in the 20 over format.
The phonenix rises from its own ashes...
ReplyDeleteassuming the phoenix WANTS to that is ...we'll have to ask the Big 3 if they want to..
Avi
Good one !! I always liked the way you linked two completely different entities and then making your point across. . . . Enjoyed this ne too.
ReplyDeletewell written Uday! keep 'em coming!
ReplyDeleteProtect the past is a nice idea but c'mon give me a break!
ReplyDeleteIt's like saying I got to be the CEO of a company because my AIR was 1. Life is not about past, it's about here and now. If the big three (two ;)) can't take it then they should step back and let the next lot step on the plate. In my view, it's got nothing to do with respect. If you want to give them respect put a statue of Sachin and others in Shivaji Park (or whereever) but please don't put them in the team.
Good post and good analysis!
ReplyDeleteThere is another reason why Indians can do better in T20. Indians have relatively shown less of 'team work' for all these years. Just a couple of players contribute in any game and the rest usually fail. In Test Cricket or 50-over cricket, team work is extremely important - you should have some 4-5 players at least who should contribute well. In T20 however, this is not the case. Even if one Gambheer or one Yuvi strikes well, the things can be very well for the entire team. You don't need anyone else to contribute well then. That's why Indians can do better.
Interestingly, there is another team which shows the same trait strongly - it's Pakistan - who were the other finalists :-)